The US government has introduced sweeping advanced AI chip export restrictions, extending beyond its ongoing limitations with China to include a global framework categorising countries into three access tiers. The move, announced in the final days of the Biden administration, aims to solidify US leadership in AI while curbing the influence of competitors such as […]
The US government has introduced sweeping advanced AI chip export restrictions, extending beyond its ongoing limitations with China to include a global framework categorising countries into three access tiers.
The move, announced in the final days of the Biden administration, aims to solidify US leadership in AI while curbing the influence of competitors such as China.
What are the new AI chip export rules?
The new regulations categorise countries into three tiers to determine their access to advanced GPUs.
Tier 1 includes allied nations such as the United Kingdom, Japan, and the Netherlands, which enjoy unrestricted access to US AI technologies.
Tier 2 comprises mid-tier countries like Singapore and Israel, which face export quotas and licensing requirements, balancing trade opportunities with security measures.
Tier 3 includes arms-embargoed nations such as China, Russia, and Iran, which remain entirely barred from receiving advanced AI technology.
These restrictions reflect US concerns about these countries using AI capabilities for purposes deemed contrary to global stability and human rights, including advanced military applications, mass surveillance, and cyber warfare.
For countries facing restrictions, computational power caps are based on a metric called Total Processing Performance (TPP).
These limits equate to approximately 50,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs, enough to support advanced AI systems and extensive research initiatives.
Key objectives and implications
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo emphasised that retaining this competitive edge is critical for both economic growth and national security: “The US leads AI now — both AI development and AI chip design, and it’s critical that we keep it that way.”
By restricting exports of advanced AI chips, the US government seeks to prevent potential adversaries from acquiring capabilities that could threaten its strategic interests, particularly in military and cybersecurity domains.
Another significant aspect of the regulations involves exemptions for major US-based cloud providers, such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, and Google.
These companies can apply for authorisations to operate AI data centres globally, bypassing licensing requirements in some cases.
However, these exemptions come with stringent conditions, including security protocols, detailed reporting requirements, and adherence to human rights standards.
Industry and political reaction
The measures align with US efforts to curtail China’s access to cutting-edge technologies, which are viewed as critical to military advancements.
AI expert Divyansh Kaushik highlighted that the caps are designed to ensure that AI developments occur in trusted environments while minimising risks of unauthorised transfers.
Nvidia and other semiconductor leaders have expressed concerns over the rules’ potential to hinder innovation and competitiveness.
Nvidia’s vice president of Government Affairs, Ned Finkle, called the measures “sweeping overreach” in an official statement on Nvidia’s website, arguing they impose bureaucratic constraints on technology already available in commercial markets.
CES 2025: Nvidia CEO unveils robotics platform, and agentic AI advances
The EU has also expressed concerns over new US restrictions, emphasising the importance of maintaining a secure transatlantic supply chain that supports mutual economic and security interests.
The US AI chip restrictions are expected to affect chipmakers, cloud providers, and researchers. Nvidia, which earns 56% of its revenue outside the US, faces significant challenges as China accounts for 17% of its sales.
However, cloud giants like Amazon and Microsoft may benefit as they secure exemptions, reinforcing their dominant positions in the global AI market.
What lies ahead?
The incoming Trump administration is expected to review the rules, with adjustments to the list of exempt countries or licensing conditions possible.
Analysts suggest that while the administration may share a hardline stance on China, there could be more flexibility in implementing the framework.
National security adviser Jake Sullivan highlighted the need for vigilance as AI continues to evolve, with implications for both economic stability and security: “The US has to be prepared for rapid increases in AI’s capability in the coming years, which could have a transformative impact on the economy and our national security.”
